skip to main content

Patenting Activities and Firm Performance: Does Firm Size Matter?

Andries, Petra ; Faems, Dries

Journal of Product Innovation Management, November 2013, Vol.30(6), pp.1089-1098 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Full text available

View all versions
Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Patenting Activities and Firm Performance: Does Firm Size Matter?
  • Author: Andries, Petra ; Faems, Dries
  • Subjects: Patents -- Analysis ; Small And Medium Sized Companies -- Intellectual Property ; Product Development -- Analysis
  • Is Part Of: Journal of Product Innovation Management, November 2013, Vol.30(6), pp.1089-1098
  • Description: Whereas prior research has provided valuable insights into the willingness of small and medium‐sized enterprises (s) and large firms to engage in patenting, a comparison of the performance implications of patenting activities across small and large firms is still lacking. This gap is important because s and large firms, having different resources and capabilities, might benefit from patenting activities in different ways. In particular, s can be expected to benefit less from patenting activities in terms of protection against imitators than large firms. On the other hand, the propensity and ability of s to license out their patents and generate additional revenue streams might be relatively higher than that of their large counterparts. This paper studies the impact of patenting on licensing, innovation, and financial performance for both s and large firms, using multiple‐group path analyses on a sample of 358 manufacturing firms. Contrary to expectations, this study demonstrates that not only large firms, but also s benefit from patenting in terms of commercializing product innovations. Moreover, for both s and large firms, such increased innovation performance in turn contributes to higher profit margins. Patenting activities also increase the ability of s and large firms to license out knowledge to external parties, and this positive effect is significantly stronger for large firms. However, neither in s nor in large firms, these outward licensing activities generate short‐term financial benefits. Finally, the study demonstrates that patenting activities do not trigger significant cost disadvantages for either s or large firms. Jointly, these findings provide unique insights in the value‐generating and cost‐increasing effects of patenting, suggesting that not only large firms, but also s should consider patenting as a viable strategy to fully reap commercial benefits from their innovation activities. At the same time, they temper open innovation scholars’ expectations regarding the financial benefits of licensing out knowledge. Overall, these findings point to opportunities for optimizing the intellectual property management of both s and large firms.
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0737-6782 ; E-ISSN: 1540-5885 ; DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12047

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait