Assessing Allometric Growth by Leaves and the Hypothesis of Diminishing Returns

Actions
1. Add to e-Shelf
2. Remove from e-Shelf
3. E-mail
4. Print
5. Permalink
6. Citation
7. EasyBib
8. EndNote
9. RefWorks
10. Delicious
11. Export RIS
12. Export BibTeX

Title:
Assessing Allometric Growth by Leaves and the Hypothesis of Diminishing Returns
Author: Packard, Gary C.
Subjects: Mathematics -- Applied mathematics -- Statistics ; Mathematics -- Mathematical expressions -- Mathematical functions ; Information science -- Information analysis -- Data analysis ; Biological sciences -- Biology -- Developmental biology ; Biological sciences -- Biology -- Botany ; Biological sciences -- Biology -- Botany ; Mathematics -- Pure mathematics -- Geometry ; Applied sciences -- Research methods -- Modeling ; Mathematics -- Applied mathematics -- Statistics ; Information science -- Information analysis -- Data analysis ; Mathematics -- Applied mathematics -- Statistics ; Mathematics -- Mathematical expressions -- Mathematical functions ; Information science -- Information analysis -- Data analysis ; Biological sciences -- Biology -- Developmental biology ; Biological sciences -- Biology -- Botany ; Biological sciences -- Biology -- Botany ; Mathematics -- Pure mathematics -- Geometry ; Applied sciences -- Research methods -- Modeling ; Mathematics -- Applied mathematics -- Statistics ; Information science -- Information analysis -- Data analysis
Is Part Of: International Journal of Plant Sciences, 01 September 2014, Vol.175(7), pp.742-753
Description: Premise of research . The hypothesis of diminishing returns posits that growth by a leaf creates new surface for capturing light but that size of the leaf is ultimately limited by disproportionately large increases in mass of the petiole, the midrib, and/or supporting elements in the lamina itself. The concept is based on numerous investigations of allometric relationships between leaves and their supporting structures. However, most of the studies in question were based on the traditional allometric method, which entails fitting a straight line to logarithmic transformations of the original data and then back transforming the resulting model to form a two-parameter power function in the arithmetic scale. I reexamined data for leaves from four species of tree to show how investigators may be misled by the traditional approach to allometric analysis. Methodology . A two-parameter power function with multiplicative lognormal heteroscedastic error first was fitted to each data set by the traditional allometric method. Four models with additive normal homoscedastic error then were fitted to untransformed data by linear and nonlinear regression, and another four regression models were fitted with additive normal heteroscedastic error. The nine fitted models were evaluated graphically and by applying Akaike’s Information Criterion. Pivotal results . The examples revealed instances in which models fitted by the traditional method failed to follow the path of the original observations, in which allometric exponents were changed substantially by fitting models directly to untransformed data and in which data actually were unsuited from the outset for use in an allometric analysis. Conclusions . Allometric equations that purportedly support the hypothesis of diminishing returns may be inaccurate and misleading. Many problems can be avoided in future research by using linear and nonlinear regression to fit models directly to untransformed observations. The current investigation provides a template for a reliable holistic approach to allometric analysis.
Language: English
Identifier: ISSN: 10585893 ; E-ISSN: 15375315 ; DOI: 10.1086/677239

Assessing Allometric Growth by Leaves and the Hypothesis of Diminishing Returns

Packard, Gary C.

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait